Rampant Lawlessness in Wallace's Court!
The "beaver dam"
scheme in Wallace's Court!
To the U.S. Supreme Court and back in!
The "Good Old Boy" network!
$122,000 in fraudulent judgments! (look at end!)
You could be next in his
Court!
There is to 9-1-1 to call, so Send Judge Wallace packing on Nov. 5!
(WE DID in 2002!)
Note: Documents derived by OCR (Optical Character Recognition) program. Errors and reformatting of the documents may have occurred. Additional reformatting is caused in the conversion to HTML format (web language). Additions will be made as time and space permit. These documents all from public records. Comments welcome.
The "beaver dam" scheme suit
against me in our 294th District Court
of Van Zandt County:
(Started in 1995. Trial with verdict in 1998. Still hanging in there in 2006.
Visiting judge trying to decide what the verdict "meant" (he did not
put the right question to the jury!)
Then he ran off, leaving the case hanging!
Attorney letter complaining of beaver dam
Suit now claiming I built "The Dam"
(Now claims I built a dam in violation of the Texas Water Code)
Private Investigator's Report (Tells who really
did what. Not me. Not the beavers. Was the lawyer! )
Request for transcript
of hearings (I could not get them. Later "they do not exist")
Complaint to Judge Wallace
(complaint of the attorney having "water flowing uphill")
Complaint to Judge
Wallace of crimes (asking for referral of the whole matter to the
US Justice Department)
Complaint to
District Attorney of trespass (by bulldozer, dynamite, etc. Ask for
referral to Grand Jury)
Complaint to District
Attorney of crimes (fabrication of the whole case. Ask
for referral to Grand Jury)
Complaint to
District Attorney of Forgery of Court Order (complaint that there is no
ORIGINAL to be found)
Complaint of Conspiracy
(complaining about the whole goings on. Again ask for the
U.S. Justice
Department)
Motion for Recusal of Judge Wallace
("recusal" is legalese for asking judge to step aside)
Hearing on "Motion to recuse"
(took two years to get a hearing on this. Then they could not decide who the
judge was that was up for "recusal'. Then denied my motion, without ever
putting on paper which judge it was!)
My Letter to TNRCC for help
(I seek help as recommended by the Private Investigator's Report)
Letter from TNRCC (Texas
Natural Resource Conservation Commission
requesting information)
Letter from attorney to TNRCC (The
lawyer
threatens the TNRCC with suit and investigation!)
Letter from TNRCC (The TNRCC backs out)
Objection to
Proceedings - Whosoever (complaint of crimes, asking referral to
U.S. Justice Department)
Hearing transcription "to enter judgment"
(the "dilemma" the court and lawyers had. Could not pass a
judgment "conforming to the pleadings and the verdict". Note the opening
scene. Search for the word "dilemma")
My federal RICO suit against the (above) "beaver dam" racket going
on in our 294th District Court:
Racketeering Suit (Dallas Federal Court
No. 3:99cv0696, Mar. 1999, upon the "beaver dam" racket)
Appeal Brief to
Fifth Court of Appeals in New Orleans
Reply Brief to
Fifth Court of Appeals in New Orleans
Appeal Brief to US
Supreme Court (Contains the funny "judgment" put out by the Dallas
Federal Court, the U.S. Fifth Circuit "finding" that the Dallas Court never had
"jurisdiction" to hear the racketeering case, then affirming the "judgment" of
the Dallas Court they just found lacked "jurisdiction". How weird!
Even finding a "judgment" in the "beaver dam case" which does not exist, and
which nobody even claimed existed! All three appeals judges!
I get sued by own lawyer in our 294th District
Court:
The Dallas lawyer sues me before the very judge whom he had sued
for "racketeering" (he was!)
Westfall suit on me
for attorney fees (claiming it was an unpaid "open account". All fraud!)
ANSWER to
Westfall suit (My "version of the truth". The judge was required
to appoint an auditor. DID NOT)
Racketeering
Counterclaim (civil RICO) (I made a claim under the civil [anti]
racketeering statute 18 U.S.C $ 1961)
Motion for
Appointment of Auditor 1 (to investigate the "state of the accounts between
the parties")
Supplement to Motion for
Appointment of Auditor 2
Second Supplement to
Motion for
Appointment of Auditor 3
Going looking for a lawyer
(the lawyers recommended to me as effective "insiders" were the very same ones
as had been my problem in the first place! Interesting reading about how
certain Canton lawyers work, coming from lawyers down in Henderson County.
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT Motion by Law Office and Westfall
SUMMARY JUDGMENT Motion by
Christina Westfall
SUMMARY JUDGMENT Motion by Stefani Podvin
SUMMARY
JUDGMENT My Response to Law Office
SUMMARY JUDGMENT My
Response to David Westfall
SUMMARY JUDGMENT My
Response to Christina Westfall
SUMMARY JUDGMENT My
Response to Stefani Podvin
SUMMARY JUDGMENT My Appendix
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Objection by the Law Office
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Objections by David Westfall
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
Objections by Christina Westfall
SUMMARY JUDGMENT Objection
by Stefani Podvin
SUMMARY JUDGMENT Order by the Court
PETITION FOR WRIT OF
MANDAMUS
MOTION FOR RECUSAL of JUDGE
(Sept. 2001)
SUPPLEMENT TO
RECUSAL of Judge (Sept. 2001)
Motion for Sanctions (5-9-2002) (for me
filing a "frivolous" lawsuit, and supposedly
"making a mockery of all lawyers and the entire judicial system", etc.,
when I was the defendant, and did not file the suit! Also
they were out of the case at the time they filed this motion! "
"All other parties [except the "Law Office"] to this lawsuit having been
dismissed previously by summary judgment rulings [pronounced 9-7-2001,
signed 11-13-2001] of the Court.")
Response to motion
for Sanctions (My response)
SUGGESTION OF DEATH (of both the lawyer
and his "Law Office" (6-25-2002) The Dallas lawyer who
was suing me got run
over by his own tractor. (Note: a "suggestion" is legalese for a way to tell the
court something that cannot be put in a normal "pleading" or a "motion")
ORAL PLEADING IN WRITING (Opening
statement) (at 7-30-2002 hearing for "frivolous lawsuit")
CLOSING PLEADING IN WRITING (Closing
statement) (at 7-30-2002 hearing) My pleading of "retaliation by
Official Oppression"
ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR
SANCTIONS (7-30-2002) $62,885.00 Sanctions against me, for
"filing a frivolous lawsuit", when I was the defendant!
NOTICE OF APPEAL (8-19-2002)
MOTION TO RECONSIDER the
$59,280.66 judgment (8-19-2002)
MOTION TO RECONSIDER the
$62,885.00 "frivolous lawsuit" Sanction (8-19-2002)
I was the defendant!
RULE 276 REQUEST for
endorsement by the Court of "refusals" and "modifications"
(8-18-2002)
MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
(8-28-2002)
SUPPLEMENT to MOTION
for new trial (8-29-02)
FIRST AMENDED NOTICE OF
APPEAL (9-3-2002)
NOTICE
OF APPEAL on sanctions (second) judgment (9-3-2002)
REQUEST FOR FINDINGS AND
CONCLUSIONS (asking the judge to be a little more specific than just
saying
"the Court is of the opinion that Movants ..... are entitled to prevail on
their claim ... ... ", without giving a hint of the "facts" the
judge found,
or the "law" he used) (9-3-2002)
NOTICE of Official
Oppression and Unlawful Judgments (10-9-2002)
DA letter 9-18-2002 (9-18-2002)
Letter to Clerk re
Notice of Official Oppression etc (10-9-2002)
Letter to Senate
Judiciary Committee (about "white collar" crime in the courts)
My
APPEAL on the two UNLAWFUL judgments See how they did it.
Details of the scheme.
Near end of document shows picture of the huge FILE in the court. Also above.
Would not have happened if they had gone by the law and the rules of court.
Try the "hyperlink" footnotes in the document (the blue things one clicks on)
Civil
RICO suit against Canton lawyer Perpetrating a scheme to "deprive of honest service" (i.e.
lawyer
lying in court) violates the anti-racketeering statute (18 U.S.C. § 1961 et seq. "RICO").
EASY READING. MAKES "RICO" UNDERSTANDABLE. ("RICO" is really simple)
Civil RICO Suit
against the Dallas lawyer Perpetrating a scheme to "deprive of
honest service"
See
home page for more details