No. 00-00619        Hit Counter

THE LAW OFFICES OF                                                 §                 IN THE DISTRICT COURT
G. DAVID WESTFALL, P.C.                                          §
&#        Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant                                     §
v.                                                                                        §                 294th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
&#                                                                                           §
UDO BIRNBAUM                                                           §
        Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff and                              §
        Third Party Plaintiff                                                  §
v.                                                                                        §
&#                                                                                           §
G. David Westfall, Christina Westfall,                            §
and Stefani Podvin                                                            §
&#        Third Party Defendants                                            §                 VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS

 

                                                            MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

        COMES NOW, Third Party Defendants, G. David Westfall, Christian Westfall, and Stefani Podvin, ("Movants"), third party defendants in the above-styled and numbered cause and files this Motion For Sanctions based upon Defendant/Third Party Plaintiffs violation of Rule 13, T. R. C. P., and violation of §§10.001 et seq. of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code, and would thereby show the Court as follows:

                                                                                     I.

                                                                                FACTS:

1. This lawsuit was brought by Plaintiff to collect on overdue legal fees for legal services rendered to the Defendant at Defendant's request.

2. Instead of a mounting a normal defense to a rather simple lawsuit such as this and raising the normal objections to a suit on. a sworn account, the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff chose

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PAGE 1 OF 5

 

instead to make this lawsuit into his own public forum to make a mockery of all lawyers and the entire legal system.

3. Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff tried unsuccessfully to intimidate and harass the Plaintiff into dropping this lawsuit by attempting to implicate the owner of the Plaintiff, G. David Westfall, as well as his wife and daughter in a totally frivolous claim of running an organized crime syndicate in the form of a law office.

4. The Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff has attempted to use the forum of this lawsuit to launch a full scale attack on the integrity and character of G. David Westfall, Christina Westfall, and Stephanie Podvin.

5. If those attacks were not enough, the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff broadened his attack in his pleadings and so called "Open Letters" to include casting aspersions at this Court, the visiting Judge, the Hon. Paul Banner, the Coordinator of the Court, the Court Reporter for the Court, and the Court of Appeals.

                                                                                            II.

Specifically, Movants file this request for sanctions against the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff for the following actions of the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff:

1. Filing a frivolous third party claim pleading without factual support or a valid legal basis in Defendant/Third Party Plaintiffs causes of action filed against either G. David Westfall, Christina Westfall, or Stefani Podvin. Movants contend that Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff filed these pleadings for the purpose of causing inconvenience and/or harassment for Stefani Podvin, Christina Westfall, G. David Westfall, P.C., and G. David Westfall, individually and not in support of any valid, legally factual, and legally supportable claims.

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PAGE 2 OF 5

 

2. Filing discovery requests and taking depositions for the purpose of harassment and inconvenience and not to support any valid claims or causes of actions against the Movants.

3. Filing a fhvolous motion to recuse the Hon. Paul Banner for the purpose of causing inconvenience and/or harassment for Movants.

4. Filing fiivolous and untimely motions to appeal the granting of the Movants' Motions for Summary Judgment granted by the trial court.

        WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Movants pray that a hearing be set on this motion, and following a hearing, the Court assess appropriate sanctions against the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff for the violations of Rule 13 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure and/or the violations of §10.001 et seq. of the Tex. Rules of Civil Procedure. Specifically, Movants request damages be assessed against the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff and awarded to the Movants for the following:

a. Reimbursement of all Movants' reasonable and necessary attorney's fees expended by Movants in defense of the allegations made by the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff in this lawsuit to the extent such attorney's fees have not yet been awarded in any prior rulings of this Court.

b. Reimbursement of all Movants' reasonable and necessary attorney's fees expended by Movants in pursuit of this Motion for Sanctions.

c. Monetary damages to reimburse Movants for the inconvenience and harassment suffered by the Movants as a direct result of the improper actions taken by the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff against the Movants in connection with this lawsuit.

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PAGE 3 OF 5

 

d. Punitive damages to be assessed against the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff and awarded to the Movants in order to prevent the reoccurrence of such behavior again in the future by the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff.

e. Damages assessed against the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff and awarded to the Court to reimburse the Court for its expenses and inconvenience suffered as a direct result of frivolous pleadings filed on behalf of the Defendant/Third Party Plaintiff.

f. And for such other and further relief, both general and special, to which Movants may be justly entitled, both at law and equity.

Respectfully submitted,
 

FRANK C. FLEMING
State Bar No. 0078405 7
PMB 305, 6611 Hillcrest Ave.
Dallas, Texas 75205-1301
(214) 373-1234
(fax) 373-3232

                                                                      ATTORNEY FOR MOVANTS

 

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PAGE 4 0F 5

                                                    CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

        I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above document has this day been delivered to Udo Birnbaum, by facsimile transmission to 903/479-3929, on this 9th day of May 2002.

FRANK C. FLEMING

 

FIAT

        Please take note that this motion is set for hearing at _____ ______ AM/PM on the ________ day of ____________, 2000

____________________

                                                            District Judge Presiding

MOTION FOR SANCTIONS
PAGE 5 OF 5