THE LAW OFFICES OF IN THE DISTRICT COURT

X

vs. 294h JUDICIAL DISTRICT

UDO BIRNBAUM VAN ZANDT COUNTY, TEXAS

On the 7hday of September 2001 came on to be heard the Motions for Summary Judgment of The Law Offices of G. David Westfall, P.C, G. David Westfall, Christina Westfall and Stefani Podvin in the above-styled and numbered cause. The court having read the Motions together with the responses thereto, having ruled on the objections to the summary judgment evidence and having heard the argument of counsel and of the pro se parties is of the opinion that the Motions are well taken and should be in all things granted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the Motions for Summary Judgment of The Law Offices of G. David Westfall, P.C. be sustained as to RICO claims and that the Motion for Summary judgment of G. David Westfall be in all things stfstained and that the Motions for Summary Judgment of Christina Westfall and Stefani Podvin be in all

things sustained.

SIGNED this the daY of )A 2 0

SENIOR JUDGE

196-TH DISTRICT COURT

SITTING j3Y ASSIGNMENT